Comparison of technologies for CO 2 capture from cement production—Part 2: Cost analysis

Publication date

2019

Authors

Gardarsdottir, Stefania Osk
De Lena, Edoardo
Romano, Matteo
Roussanaly, Simon
Voldsund, Mari
Pérez-Calvo, José Francisco
Berstad, David
Fu, Chao
Anantharaman, Rahul
Sutter, Daniel

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

This paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO 2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO 2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO 2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO 2 avoided is between 42 €/t CO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/t CO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/t CO2 . Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO 2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerations.

Keywords

Calcium looping, CCS, Cement, Chilled ammonia, MEA-based absorption, Membrane-assisted CO liquefaction, Oxyfuel, Techno-economic analysis, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Energy (miscellaneous), Control and Optimization, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy

Citation

Gardarsdottir, S O, De Lena, E, Romano, M, Roussanaly, S, Voldsund, M, Pérez-Calvo, J F, Berstad, D, Fu, C, Anantharaman, R, Sutter, D, Gazzani, M, Mazzotti, M & Cinti, G 2019, 'Comparison of technologies for CO 2 capture from cement production—Part 2 : Cost analysis', Energies, vol. 12, no. 3, 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030542