Anatomical distribution and treatment for fractures and dislocations of the proximal and middle phalanges: a multicentre snapshot study of 461 patients

Files

Access status: Embargo until 2026-09-03 , s00068-025-03074-4.pdf (2.05 MB)

Publication date

2026-03-03

Authors

de Haas, L. E.M.
Salentijn, D. A.
Hendriks, T. C.C.
Schep, N. W.L.
Van Heijl, M.
Snapshot Hand Fractures Collaborative Study Group

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

License

taverne

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the anatomical distribution of fractures and dislocations of the proximal and middle phalanges, the current treatment modalities, and potential variations in treatment approaches. Methods: This multi-centre cross-sectional study included patients presenting with single fractures of the proximal or middle phalanges and dislocations (excluding the thumb) over a three-month period in 2020. Data collection included demographic details, injury location and fracture pattern, and treatment modalities. Treatment categories included non-operative management (e.g., functional treatment allowing digit mobilisation, immobilisation, and immobilisation duration), surgical interventions, and post-operative care (functional treatment or immobilisation and immobilization duration). Results: A total of 461 patients were included, with 395 (86%) managed non-operatively and 66 (14%) undergoing surgical intervention. The most frequently encountered injuries were proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) avulsion fractures (137/461, 30%), followed by proximal phalanx shaft fractures (132/461, 29%), and dorsal PIPJ dislocations (57/461, 12%). Among patients with PIPJ palmar plate avulsion fractures managed non-operatively, 72% (88/123) were treated with functional treatment in the emergency department (ED), increasing to 94% after the initial follow-up. For proximal phalanx shaft fractures this was 28% (26/93), increasing to 53% after follow-up, and for PIPJ dislocations this was 71%, increasing to 80%. The rates of functional treatment for PIPJ avulsion fractures and dislocations showed significant variation across hospitals (p < 0.001). Operative treatment of proximal and middle shaft fractures primarily involved closed reduction and K-wire fixation, performed in 69% (25/36) and 82% (9/11) of the cases, respectively. Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the anatomical distribution of various types of injuries of the proximal and middle phalanges, including intra-articular and avulsion fractures and dislocations. Additionally, it highlights practice variations in non-operative treatment approaches and immobilisation duration, influenced by hospital setting. These findings could inform future research aimed at optimizing treatment strategies for these prevalent injuries.

Keywords

Middle phalanx, Phalangeal fractures, PIPJ dislocation, Proximal phalanx, Treatment variation, Taverne, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Citation

de Haas, L E M, Salentijn, D A, Hendriks, T C C, Schep, N W L, van Heijl, M & Snapshot Hand Fractures Collaborative Study Group 2026, 'Anatomical distribution and treatment for fractures and dislocations of the proximal and middle phalanges : a multicentre snapshot study of 461 patients', European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, vol. 52, no. 1, 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-03074-4