Improved modelling of lifestyle changes in Integrated Assessment ModelT: Cross-disciplinary insights from methodologies and theories

Publication date

2019

Authors

van den Berg, Nicole JaneORCID 0000-0002-2884-7399ISNI 0000000492613209
Hof, AndriesORCID 0000-0002-7568-5038ISNI 0000000390278972
Akenji, Lewis
Edelenbosch, Oreane Y.
van Sluisveld, MariësseORCID 0000-0002-3600-2425ISNI 0000000454719117
Timmer, Vanessa J.
van Vuuren, Detlef P.ORCID 0000-0003-0398-2831ISNI 0000000040910093

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Recent studies show that lifestyle changes can provide an essential contribution to achieving the Paris climate targets. While some efforts have been made to incorporate lifestyle changes into model-based scenarios, the attempts are currently very stylised and included exogenously. This paper discusses current efforts to represent lifestyle change in models, and analyses potential insights from relevant scientific disciplines to improve the representation of lifestyle changes in models – including modelling specific behaviour changes, identifying cross-cutting lifestyle solutions, representing the intentions behind the changes and quantifying their impacts. As such, this research attempts to bridge the gap between qualitative and quantitative theories and methodologies. Based on the results of this literature analysis, we recommend defining lifestyle changes more harmoniously, exploring an expanded range of approaches, domains and transformative solutions, adopting a whole-systems approach, and addressing the trade-offs between the use of exogenous inputs and endogenous modelling.

Keywords

Behaviour change, Integrated assessment, Mitigation, Scenarios, Sustainable lifestyles, Energy (miscellaneous)

Citation

van den Berg, N J, Hof, A F, Akenji, L, Edelenbosch, O Y, van Sluisveld, M A E, Timmer, V J & van Vuuren, D P 2019, 'Improved modelling of lifestyle changes in Integrated Assessment ModelT : Cross-disciplinary insights from methodologies and theories', Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 26, 100420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100420