A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies
Files
Publication date
2019-01-31
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Prognostic factors are associated with the risk of future health outcomes in individuals with a particular health condition or some clinical start point (eg, a particular diagnosis). Research to identify genuine prognostic factors is important because these factors can help improve risk stratification, treatment, and lifestyle decisions, and the design of randomised trials. Although thousands of prognostic factor studies are published each year, often they are of variable quality and the findings are inconsistent. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are therefore needed that summarise the evidence about the prognostic value of particular factors. In this article, the key steps involved in this review process are described.
Keywords
Data Collection/trends, Humans, Life Style, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Prognosis, Publication Bias/statistics & numerical data, Research Design/trends, Risk Assessment/trends, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Taverne, General Medicine, Journal Article
Citation
Riley, R D, Moons, K G M, Snell, K I E, Ensor, J, Hooft, L, Altman, D G, Hayden, J, Collins, G S & Debray, T P A 2019, 'A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies', BMJ (Online), vol. 364, k4597. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4597