Survey of veterinarians in the Netherlands on antimicrobial use for surgical prophylaxis in dairy practice

Publication date

2021-08

Authors

Jorritsma, RuurdISNI 0000000396117889
Van der Heide, A.
van Geijlswijk, I.M.ORCID 0000-0003-1306-8605ISNI 0000000492887373

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

There is increased concern about the selection pressure of antimicrobial use (AMU) in humans as well in farm animals resulting in antimicrobial (AM) resistance. The introduction of monitoring of AMU in food-producing animals since 2011 has led to a considerable quantitative reduction of AMU in those animal species in the Netherlands. This survey was conducted to explore the possibilities to improve prudent use of AM in the cattle industry. We sent an online questionnaire to 373 veterinarians and asked which antimicrobial prophylaxis they used for their most recently performed cesarean section (CS) and left displaced abomasum (LDA) correction. With a response rate of 30%, we found that older graduates used more AM for CS than recently graduated veterinarians (odds ratio = 2.4 to 2.7 depending on category), whereas antimicrobial prophylaxis in LDA surgeries was significantly different for the available surgical correction methods. The results indicate that the respondents do not adjust the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis for different conditions of the patient or the environment; 37 (38%) respondents consider that the risks of contamination are similar for CS and LDA. In CS and all LDA correction methods preoperative prophylaxis was significantly less often applied than postoperative antimicrobial treatments (odds ratio = 0.05 and 0.08, respectively). When preoperative prophylaxis was applied, the choice of (combinations of) the AM and the timing of administration were not adequate at the start of the surgical procedure (88% for CS and 90% for LDA). We conclude that considerable qualitative (timing, choice of antimicrobial, route of administration) and quantitative (limit AMU to indicated procedures) improvement on antimicrobial prophylaxis for CS and LDA is possible by appreciation of the risks of the type of surgery (CS, LDA) and its conditions as well as by selecting classes of AM and timing and routes of administration that result in effective drug concentrations at the start of the procedure.

Keywords

cattle, cesarean section, correction of abomasum displacement, prudent antimicrobial use, Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics

Citation

Jorritsma, R, Van der Heide, A & Van Geijlswijk, I M 2021, 'Survey of veterinarians in the Netherlands on antimicrobial use for surgical prophylaxis in dairy practice', Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 9106-9114. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19616