Legal Europeanization: Comparative Perspectives

Files

Access status: Embargo until 2050-01-01 , legal_2010.pdf (513.73 KB)

Publication date

2010

Authors

Muller, W.C.
Bovens, MarkISNI 0000000115933426
Gronnegaard Christensen, J.
Jenny, M.
Yesilkagit, KutsalISNI 0000000037160578

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

License

Abstract

By mid-2003, the legal orders (the entire bodies of legislation in force) of three EU member states – Austria , Denmark, and The Netherlands – contained between 10.5 and 14.2 per cent of rules devoted to the transposition of EU directives. Only a few ministerial jurisdictions contain more than 20 per cent of Europeanized rules. The member states show remarkable differences in the use of parliamentary versus delegated legislation as a means of transposition. The comparison of the three cases tentatively suggests that different legal traditions and the parliamentary involvement in EU affairs are important factors that account for cross-national differences.

Keywords

International (English)

Citation

Muller, W C, Bovens, M A P, Gronnegaard Christensen, J, Jenny, M & Yesilkagit, A K 2010, 'Legal Europeanization: Comparative Perspectives', Public Administration, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01817.x