Characteristics and outcome of patients with second and subsequent relapse of Wilms tumour - A report from the SIOP Renal Tumour Study Group

Publication date

2026-06

Authors

Groenendijk, Alissa
Mavinkurve-Groothuis, Annelies M.C.
van Tinteren, Harm
de Krijger, Ronald R.
Al-Saadi, Reem
Pritchard-Jones, Kathy
Ramírez-Villar, Gema L.
Vujanic, Gordan
Melchior, Patrick
Godzinski, Jan

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

Background: Second or subsequent relapses of Wilms tumour (WT) are rarely reported. We assessed the characteristics, treatments, and outcome of such patients through a retrospective international cohort study of patients treated according to recent SIOP-RTSG protocols. Methods: Patients with a second or subsequent relapse enrolled in SIOP WT 2001 and the UK-IMPORT study, and registered in the SIOP-RTSG database between 2001 and 2021 were included. Risk groups were defined per the SIOP-RTSG-2016 UMBRELLA protocol (AA-BB (second relapse after initial standard risk (AA) relapse), BB-CC (initial high risk (BB) relapse), and CC-CC (initial very high risk (CC) relapse). Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and competing risk methods; survival between relapse risk groups was compared with log-rank testing. Findings: Among 572 patients with first relapse, 114 (20%) patients experienced a subsequent relapse. The estimated 5-year EFS and OS after second relapse were 17.7% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 11.1–28.0%) and 22.4% (95% CI: 15.3–32.9%). In group AA-BB (n = 39) 5-year EFS and OS were 39.0% (95% CI: 25.0–60.7%) and 41.0% (95% CI: 26.8–62.8%). In group BB-CC (n = 32), 5-year EFS was 14.8% (95% CI: 6.05–36.3%) and 5-year OS was 21.9% (95% CI: 10.9–44.0%). All CC-CC patients (n = 35) either died within 3 years of the second relapse or lacked adequate follow-up. Group AA-BB had predominantly been treated with ICE/CyCE regimens, and group BB-CC patients mainly with VIT/TOTEM regimens. Conclusion: A second relapse WT remains curable in a proportion of AA-BB patients. In contrast, survival rates for BB-CC patients are minimal and dismal for CC-CC patients, who should be allocated to a relevant early-phase trial if feasible.

Keywords

SIOP protocol, Subsequent relapse, Treatment, Wilms tumour, Dentistry (miscellaneous), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous), Hematology, Oncology, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Citation

Groenendijk, A, Mavinkurve-Groothuis, A M C, van Tinteren, H, de Krijger, R R, Al-Saadi, R, Pritchard-Jones, K, Ramírez-Villar, G L, Vujanic, G, Melchior, P, Godzinski, J, Schenk, J P, Graf, N, Segers, H, Sudour-Bonnange, H, Verschuur, A C, Drost, J, Perotti, D, Koenig, C, Spreafico, F, Brok, J & van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M M 2026, 'Characteristics and outcome of patients with second and subsequent relapse of Wilms tumour - A report from the SIOP Renal Tumour Study Group', EJC Paediatric Oncology, vol. 7, 100520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100520