Liberal Political Philosophy of Religious Difference after Saba Mahmood
Publication date
2019
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
This contribution responds to Saba Mahmood’s critique of secularism and uses it for theory development in liberal political philosophy. Building on the work of Rahel Jaeggi I reconstruct selected parts of Mahmood’s works as an immanent critique of secular- ism as a form of life. I argue that liberal egalitarian political philosophical approaches to religious difference should broaden the focus of social critique. Beyond – but not instead of – formal regulations such as constitutional law and religious accommodation, political philosophy needs to address what Mahmood calls “ethical sensibilities”, and informal social practices and conventions. My considerations are informed by an exploration of the refusal of some pious Muslims to shake hands with someone of the opposite sex, and controversies about this issue in Western-European countries.
Keywords
form of life, immanent critique, political philosophy, religious difference, secularism, Taverne
Citation
Baumgartner, C 2019, 'Liberal Political Philosophy of Religious Difference after Saba Mahmood', Sociology of Islam, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 301-322. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131418-00704001