The RESISTANT study (Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy): results of a randomized controlled trial

Publication date

2025-12

Authors

Kant-Smits, Kim
Bartels, BartORCID 0000-0002-5801-6692
Van Eijk, RubenORCID 0000-0002-7132-5967
Asselman, Fay Lynn
Veldhoen, Esther S.ISNI 0000000387514671
van der Ent, Cornelis KISNI 0000000388008551
van der Pol, W. LudoISNI 0000000394367411
Hulzebos, EISNI 0000000394562807

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and feasibility of respiratory muscle training (RMT) in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and respiratory muscle weakness. Design: A 4-month, single-blinded RCT, followed by an 8-month extension phase. Setting: The outpatient clinic of the Neurology department and the Child Development and Exercise Center at the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. Participants: 30 participants, ≥eight years, SMA type 1 to 4, and respiratory muscle weakness. Interventions: The training group started RMT at 30% of their maximum inspiratory (PImax) and expiratory pressure (PEmax) and adjusted their training intensity based on perceived exertion. The control group started and continued RMT at 10% of PImax and PEmax. After four months, the control group received the same RMT as the training group. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the between-group difference in PImax after the RCT phase. Additionally, we explored the association between training volume (i.e., number of training sessions x training intensity) and increase in PImax over 1 year. Results: 25 participants completed the study. Mean PImax after four months (corrected for baseline value) training group: 61.1 cmH2O, control group: 54.3 cmH2O, mean difference in PImax: 6.8 cmH2O [95% CI: −2.0 to 15.6]. Despite the study being underpowered, we did find an association between training volume and increase in PImax (R2 = 0.531). Conclusion: There was a small between-group difference in PImax after the RCT phase. The training was safe, but the feasibility of the training needs further improvement. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NL73280.041.20. Contribution of the Paper: • There was a small difference in PImax improvement between training at different intensities (10% vs 30% of PImax). • Higher training volume (frequency times intensity) is associated with improvement of inspiratory muscle strength. • Supervision (by physiotherapists) might contribute to better adherence to respiratory muscle training.

Keywords

Maximum expiratory pressure, Maximum inspiratory pressure, Muscular atrophy, spinal, Respiratory muscle training, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Journal Article

Citation

Kant-Smits, K, Bartels, B, van Eijk, R P A, Asselman, F-L, Veldhoen, E S, van der Ent, K, van der Pol, W L & Hulzebos, E H J 2025, 'The RESISTANT study (Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy) : results of a randomized controlled trial', Physiotherapy, vol. 129, 101842, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2025.101842