Population differences and the effect of vaginal progesterone on preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor*

Publication date

2016-10-01

Authors

Hermans, Frederik Jan Robin
Karolinski, Ariel
Othenin-Girard, Véronique
Bertolino, María Victoria
Schuit, EORCID 0000-0002-9548-3214ISNI 000000039432776X
Salgado, Pablo
Hösli, Irene
Irion, Olivier
Laterra, Cristina
Mol, Ben Willem J

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Objective: Threatened preterm labor (tPTL) is a complication of pregnancy. Identification of women and clinical definition differs between countries. This study investigated differences in tPTL and effectiveness of vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth (PTB) between two countries. Methods: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) from Argentina and Switzerland comparing vaginal progesterone to placebo in women with tPTL (n = 379). Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to compare placebo groups of both countries and to compare progesterone to placebo within each country. We adjusted for baseline differences. Iatrogenic onset of labor or pregnancy beyond gestational age of interest was censored. Results: Swiss and Argentinian women were different on baseline. Risks for delivery

Keywords

Harm, population differences, preterm birth, randomized controlled trial, secondary analysis, selection criteria, threatened preterm labor, treatment effect, treatment interaction, vaginal progesterone, Taverne, Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Journal Article, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial

Citation

Hermans, F J R, Karolinski, A, Othenin-Girard, V, Bertolino, M V, Schuit, E, Salgado, P, Hösli, I, Irion, O, Laterra, C, Mol, B W J & Martinez de Tejada, B 2016, 'Population differences and the effect of vaginal progesterone on preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor *', Journal of Maternal-fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol. 29, no. 19, pp. 3223-3228. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1121476