Gene Therapy with Etranacogene Dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B

Publication date

2023-02-23

Authors

Pipe, Steven W
Leebeek, Frank W G
Recht, Michael
Key, Nigel S
Castaman, Giancarlo
Miesbach, Wolfgang
Lattimore, Susan
Peerlinck, Kathelijne
van der Valk, Paul D.L.P.M.
Coppens, Michiel

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Background: Moderate-to-severe hemophilia B is treated with lifelong, continuous coagulation factor IX replacement to prevent bleeding. Gene therapy for hemophilia B aims to establish sustained factor IX activity, thereby protecting against bleeding without burdensome factor IX replacement. Methods: In this open-label, phase 3 study, after a lead-in period (≥6 months) of factor IX prophylaxis, we administered one infusion of adeno-associated virus 5 (AAV5) vector expressing the Padua factor IX variant (etranacogene dezaparvovec; 2×1013 genome copies per kilogram of body weight) to 54 men with hemophilia B (factor IX activity ≤2% of the normal value) regardless of preexisting AAV5 neutralizing antibodies. The primary end point was the annualized bleeding rate, evaluated in a noninferiority analysis comparing the rate during months 7 through 18 after etranacogene dezaparvovec treatment with the rate during the lead-in period. Noninferiority of etranacogene dezaparvovec was defined as an upper limit of the two-sided 95% Wald confidence interval of the annualized bleeding rate ratio that was less than the noninferiority margin of 1.8. Superiority, additional efficacy measures, and safety were also assessed. Results: The annualized bleeding rate decreased from 4.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.22 to 5.45) during the lead-in period to 1.51 (95% CI, 0.81 to 2.82) during months 7 through 18 after treatment, for a rate ratio of 0.36 (95% Wald CI, 0.20 to 0.64; P<0.001), demonstrating noninferiority and superiority of etranacogene dezaparvovec as compared with factor IX prophylaxis. Factor IX activity had increased from baseline by a least-squares mean of 36.2 percentage points (95% CI, 31.4 to 41.0) at 6 months and 34.3 percentage points (95% CI, 29.5 to 39.1) at 18 months after treatment, and usage of factor IX concentrate decreased by a mean of 248,825 IU per year per participant in the post-treatment period (P<0.001 for all three comparisons). Benefits and safety were observed in participants with predose AAV5 neutralizing antibody titers of less than 700. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy was superior to prophylactic factor IX with respect to the annualized bleeding rate, and it had a favorable safety profile.

Keywords

Factor IX/genetics, Genetic Therapy/methods, Genetic Vectors/administration & dosage, Hemophilia B/complications, Hemorrhage/etiology, Humans, Male, Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, Childhood Diseases, Coagulation, Genetics General, Genetics, Taverne, General Medicine, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article

Citation

Pipe, S W, Leebeek, F W G, Recht, M, Key, N S, Castaman, G, Miesbach, W, Lattimore, S, Peerlinck, K, Van der Valk, P, Coppens, M, Kampmann, P, Meijer, K, O'Connell, N, Pasi, K J, Hart, D P, Kazmi, R, Astermark, J, Hermans, C R J R, Klamroth, R, Lemons, R, Visweshwar, N, von Drygalski, A, Young, G, Crary, S E, Escobar, M, Gomez, E, Kruse-Jarres, R, Quon, D V, Symington, E, Wang, M, Wheeler, A P, Gut, R, Liu, Y P, Dolmetsch, R E, Cooper, D L, Li, Y, Goldstein, B & Monahan, P E 2023, 'Gene Therapy with Etranacogene Dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B', The New England journal of medicine, vol. 388, no. 8, pp. 706-718. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2211644