Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Review

Publication date

2022-07

Authors

Florkow, Mateusz C
Willemsen, K.ORCID 0000-0002-8237-6321
Mascarenhas, Vasco V.
Oei, Edwin H.G.
van Stralen, MORCID 0000-0002-3051-5000ISNI 0000000395962765
Seevinck, P.R.ISNI 0000000390489892

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly utilized as a radiation-free alternative to computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis and treatment planning of musculoskeletal pathologies. MR imaging of hard tissues such as cortical bone remains challenging due to their low proton density and short transverse relaxation times, rendering bone tissues as nonspecific low signal structures on MR images obtained from most sequences. Developments in MR image acquisition and post-processing have opened the path for enhanced MR-based bone visualization aiming to provide a CT-like contrast and, as such, ease clinical interpretation. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of studies comparing MR and CT imaging for diagnostic and treatment planning purposes in orthopedic care, with a special focus on selective bone visualization, bone segmentation, and three-dimensional (3D) modeling. This review discusses conventional gradient-echo derived techniques as well as dedicated short echo time acquisition techniques and post-processing techniques, including the generation of synthetic CT, in the context of 3D and specific bone visualization. Based on the reviewed literature, it may be concluded that the recent developments in MRI-based bone visualization are promising. MRI alone provides valuable information on both bone and soft tissues for a broad range of applications including diagnostics, 3D modeling, and treatment planning in multiple anatomical regions, including the skull, spine, shoulder, pelvis, and long bones. Level of Evidence: 3. Technical Efficacy: Stage 3.

Keywords

bone and bones, comparative review, CT, diagnostic imaging, joints, MRI, Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods, Skull, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Pelvis, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Journal Article

Citation

Florkow, M C, Willemsen, K, Mascarenhas, V V, Oei, E H G, van Stralen, M & Seevinck, P R 2022, 'Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies : A Review', Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28067