Reactions to no-fault compensation schemes for occupational diseases in the Netherlands: the role of perceived procedural justice, outcome concerns and trust in authorities
Publication date
2025-09
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Financial redress for victims of occupational diseases can be offered through no-fault compensation schemes. No-fault compensation schemes have an explicit mission in promoting perceived fairness and justice. The objective is to offer a quick, fair and just procedure and outcome, while preventing civil court procedures and restoring trust. However, the question is whether applicants of these no-fault schemes indeed experience perceived fairness and justice. This paper discusses the result of an in-depth interview study with fifty-eight victims involved in no-fault schemes for occupational diseases in the Netherlands. We focus on the role of perceived procedural justice, outcome concerns and trust in the (former) employer.
Keywords
compensation law, no-fault compensation schemes, occupational diseases, procedural justice, tort law, Law
Citation
Overheul, M, Van den Bos, K & Rijnhout, R 2025, 'Reactions to no-fault compensation schemes for occupational diseases in the Netherlands : the role of perceived procedural justice, outcome concerns and trust in authorities', International Journal of Law in Context, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 367-388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552324000466