Reactions to no-fault compensation schemes for occupational diseases in the Netherlands: the role of perceived procedural justice, outcome concerns and trust in authorities

Publication date

2025-09

Authors

Overheul, MarlouORCID 0009-0007-1911-7697ISNI 0000000459085352
Van den Bos, KeesORCID 0000-0003-2777-9344ISNI 0000000387843723
Rijnhout, R.ORCID 0000-0003-4656-7363ISNI 0000000395187199

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Financial redress for victims of occupational diseases can be offered through no-fault compensation schemes. No-fault compensation schemes have an explicit mission in promoting perceived fairness and justice. The objective is to offer a quick, fair and just procedure and outcome, while preventing civil court procedures and restoring trust. However, the question is whether applicants of these no-fault schemes indeed experience perceived fairness and justice. This paper discusses the result of an in-depth interview study with fifty-eight victims involved in no-fault schemes for occupational diseases in the Netherlands. We focus on the role of perceived procedural justice, outcome concerns and trust in the (former) employer.

Keywords

compensation law, no-fault compensation schemes, occupational diseases, procedural justice, tort law, Law

Citation

Overheul, M, Van den Bos, K & Rijnhout, R 2025, 'Reactions to no-fault compensation schemes for occupational diseases in the Netherlands : the role of perceived procedural justice, outcome concerns and trust in authorities', International Journal of Law in Context, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 367-388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552324000466