Assimilation and contrast in organizational justice : The role of rimed mindsets in the psychology of the fair process effect

Publication date

2002

Authors

Bos, K. van den

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

DOI

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

This paper focuses on the psychology of the fair process effect (the frequently eplicated finding that perceived procedural fairness positively affects people’s reactions). It is argued that when people have received an outcome they usually assimilate their atings of outcome fairness and affect toward their experiences of procedural fairness. As a result, ratings show fair process effects. It is also possible, however, that when people have received their outcome they compare this outcome to the procedure they experienced: Is the outcome better or worse than the procedure? A result of this comparison process may be that contrast effects are found such that higher levels of procedural fairness lead to more negative ratings of outcome fairness and affect. Research findings suggest that when comparison goals have been primed, contrast effects indeed can be found. The implications for the psychology of the fair process effect and organizational behavior are discussed. 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Keywords

Fairness, Primes, Justice, Procedures, Outcomes, Assimilation, Contrast, Human judgment

Citation