Assimilation and contrast in organizational justice : The role of rimed mindsets in the psychology of the fair process effect
Publication date
2002
Authors
Bos, K. van den
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
This paper focuses on the psychology of the fair process effect (the frequently eplicated
finding that perceived procedural fairness positively affects people’s reactions). It is argued that when people have received an outcome they usually assimilate their atings of outcome fairness and affect toward their experiences of procedural fairness. As a result, ratings show fair process effects. It is also possible, however, that when people have received their outcome
they compare this outcome to the procedure they experienced: Is the outcome better or worse than the procedure? A result of this comparison process may be that contrast effects are found such that higher levels of procedural fairness lead to more negative ratings of outcome fairness and affect. Research findings suggest that when comparison goals have been primed, contrast
effects indeed can be found. The implications for the psychology of the fair process effect and organizational behavior are discussed. 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
Keywords
Fairness, Primes, Justice, Procedures, Outcomes, Assimilation, Contrast, Human judgment