Why External Witnesses Report Organizational Misconduct to Inspectorates: A Comparative Case Study in Three Inspectorates

Publication date

2020-02

Authors

van Erp, JudithISNI 0000000050281841
Loyens, KimORCID 0000-0002-3080-534XISNI 0000000352246830

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Inspectorates and enforcement agencies increasingly depend on information from societal actors to detect and enforce business offenses, but little is known about the factors underlying external reporting. This paper aims to contribute to a better understanding of what drives external reporters to report offenses to enforcement agencies, and how reporters experience the reporting process. Potential reasons to report are derived of the literature on whistleblowing and on business relations within organizational fields. The article then presents findings of an extensive comparative, qualitative empirical study on reporting businesses. We find that reporters aim to incapacitate competitors who gain economic advantage by bending the rules, and regard inspectorates as their ally in maintaining a level playing field.

Keywords

enforcement, inspectorates, offenses, reporting, whistleblowing, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Marketing

Citation

van Erp, J & Loyens, K 2020, 'Why External Witnesses Report Organizational Misconduct to Inspectorates : A Comparative Case Study in Three Inspectorates', Administration and Society, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 265–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718787771