A FOXO-dependent replication checkpoint restricts proliferation of damaged cells

Publication date

2021-01-26

Authors

Hornsveld, M
Feringa, Femke M.
Krenning, Lenno
van den Berg, Jeroen
Smits, Lydia M.M.
Nguyen, Nguyen B.T.
Rodríguez-Colman, Maria J
Dansen, TobiasORCID 0000-0001-5259-8815ISNI 0000000394902015
Medema, René HISNI 000000039472444X
Burgering, BoudewijnORCID 0000-0002-4044-9596ISNI 0000000391409962

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

DNA replication is challenged by numerous exogenous and endogenous factors that can interfere with the progression of replication forks. Substantial accumulation of single-stranded DNA during DNA replication activates the DNA replication stress checkpoint response that slows progression from S/G2 to M phase to protect genomic integrity. Whether and how mild replication stress restricts proliferation remains controversial. Here, we identify a cell cycle exit mechanism that prevents S/G2 phase arrested cells from undergoing mitosis after exposure to mild replication stress through premature activation of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/CCDH1). We find that replication stress causes a gradual decrease of the levels of the APC/CCDH1 inhibitor EMI1/FBXO5 through Forkhead box O (FOXO)-mediated inhibition of its transcription factor E2F1. By doing so, FOXOs limit the time during which the replication stress checkpoint is reversible and thereby play an important role in maintaining genomic stability.

Keywords

cell cycle exit, checkpoint recovery, DNA damage checkpoint, DNA replication stress, EMI1, FOXO, genomic instability, senescence, General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology

Citation

Hornsveld, M, Feringa, F M, Krenning, L, van den Berg, J, Smits, L M M, Nguyen, N B T, Rodríguez-Colman, M J, Dansen, T B, Medema, R H & Burgering, B M T 2021, 'A FOXO-dependent replication checkpoint restricts proliferation of damaged cells', Cell Reports, vol. 34, no. 4, 108675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108675