Pre- and post-docking sampling of conformational changes using ClustENM and HADDOCK for protein-protein and protein-DNA systems

Publication date

2020-02

Authors

Kurkcuoglu Soner, ZeynepISNI 0000000506015083
Bonvin, Alexandre M J JORCID 0000-0001-7369-1322ISNI 0000000396501354

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Incorporating the dynamic nature of biomolecules in the modeling of their complexes is a challenge, especially when the extent and direction of the conformational changes taking place upon binding is unknown. Estimating whether the binding of a biomolecule to its partner(s) occurs in a conformational state accessible to its unbound form (“conformational selection”) and/or the binding process induces conformational changes (“induced-fit”) is another challenge. We propose here a method combining conformational sampling using ClustENM—an elastic network-based modeling procedure—with docking using HADDOCK, in a framework that incorporates conformational selection and induced-fit effects upon binding. The extent of the applied deformation is estimated from its energetical costs, inspired from mechanical tensile testing on materials. We applied our pre- and post-docking sampling of conformational changes to the flexible multidomain protein-protein docking benchmark and a subset of the protein-DNA docking benchmark. Our ClustENM-HADDOCK approach produced acceptable to medium quality models in 7/11 and 5/6 cases for the protein-protein and protein-DNA complexes, respectively. The conformational selection (sampling prior to docking) has the highest impact on the quality of the docked models for the protein-protein complexes. The induced-fit stage of the pipeline (post-sampling), however, improved the quality of the final models for the protein-DNA complexes. Compared to previously described strategies to handle conformational changes, ClustENM-HADDOCK performs better than two-body docking in protein-protein cases but worse than a flexible multidomain docking approach. However, it does show a better or similar performance compared to previous protein-DNA docking approaches, which makes it a suitable alternative.

Keywords

biomolecular complexes, conformational flexibility, elastic network modeling, Structural Biology, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology

Citation

Kurkcuoglu, Z & Bonvin, A M J J 2020, 'Pre- and post-docking sampling of conformational changes using ClustENM and HADDOCK for protein-protein and protein-DNA systems', Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25802