Supervised Exercise for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Cost-Utility Analysis Alongside the PREFERABLE-EFFECT Randomized Controlled Trial

Publication date

2025-04-10

Authors

Schouten, Aniek E MORCID 0000-0001-8860-3823
Hiensch, Anouk EORCID 0000-0002-6216-2609
Frederix, Geert W J
Monninkhof, Evelyn MORCID 0000-0002-6641-7605ISNI 0000000387581778
Schmidt, Martina E.
Clauss, Dorothea
Gunasekara, Nadira
Belloso, Jon
Trevaskis, Mark
Rundqvist, Helene

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

PURPOSE To evaluate the cost utility of a 9-month supervised exercise program for patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), compared with control (usual care, supplemented with general activity advice and an activity tracker). Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of exercise for patients with mBC is essential for implementation in clinical practice and is currently lacking. METHODS A cost-utility analysis was performed alongside the multinational PREFERABLE-EFFECT randomized controlled trial, conducted in 8 centers across Europe and Australia. Patients with mBC (N 5 357) were randomly assigned to either a 9-month, twice-weekly, supervised exercise group (EG) or control group (CG). Costs of the exercise program were calculated through a bottom-up approach. Other health care resource use, productivity losses, and quality of life were collected using country-adapted, self-reported questionnaires. Analyses were conducted from a societal perspective with a time horizon of 9 months. Costs were collected and reported in 2021 Euros (V1 5 $1.18 US dollars). RESULTS Compared with the CG, EG resulted in a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain of 0.013 (95% CI, –0.02 to 0.05) over a 9-month period. The mean costs of the exercise program were V1,696 per patient with one-on-one supervision (scenario 1) and V609 with one-on-four supervision (scenario 2). These costs were offset by savings in health care and productivity costs, resulting in mean total cost differences of –V163 (scenario 1) and –V1,249 (scenario 2) in favor of EG. The probability of supervised exercise being cost-effective was 65% in scenario 1 and 91% in scenario 2 at a willingness-to-pay threshold of V20,000 per QALY. CONCLUSION Exercise for patients with mBC increases quality of life, decreases costs, and is likely to be cost-effective. Group-based supervision is expected to have even higher cost-savings. Our positive findings can inform reimbursement of supervised exercise interventions for patients with mBC.

Keywords

Oncology, Cancer Research

Citation

Schouten, A E M, Hiensch, A E, Frederix, G W J, Monninkhof, E M, Schmidt, M E, Clauss, D, Gunasekara, N, Belloso, J, Trevaskis, M, Rundqvist, H, Wiskemann, J, Müller, J, Sweegers, M G, Fremd, C, Altena, R, Bijlsma, R M, Sonke, G, Lahuerta, A, Mann, G B, Francis, P A, Richardson, G, Malter, W, Kufel-Grabowska, J, Van Der Wall, E, Aaronson, N K, Senkus, E, Urruticoechea, A, Zopf, E M, Bloch, W, Stuiver, M M, Wengstrom, Y, Steindorf, K, Van Der Meulen, M P & May, A M 2025, 'Supervised Exercise for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer : A Cost-Utility Analysis Alongside the PREFERABLE-EFFECT Randomized Controlled Trial', Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 43, no. 11, doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01441, pp. 1325-1337. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01441