Efficacy of Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab and Methotrexate Combination Therapy in the Prevention of Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Analysis Using Individual Patient Data From Multiple Clinical Trials

Publication date

2022-06

Authors

Verhoeven, Maxime M A
Tekstra, Janneke
Jacobs, Johannes W GISNI 0000000389295855
Bijlsma, Johannes W JISNI 0000000358198681
van Laar, Jacob MORCID 0000-0001-5544-5785ISNI 0000000394424279
Pethö-Schramm, Attila
Borm, Michelle E A
Lafeber, F. P J GISNI 0000000393082668
Welsing, Paco M JORCID 0000-0003-2361-2803ISNI 0000000392498303

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of preventing radiographic progression (in its 3 components) of tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy with those of TCZ and methotrexate (MTX) in combination therapy (TCZ + MTX), and to evaluate possible effect modifiers in this model. METHODS: Randomized trials that compared TCZ monotherapy to TCZ + MTX combination therapy for differences in radiographic progression were analyzed on an individual patient data level using mixed-effects models, and data were collected from 820 subjects with either early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or established RA. Outcomes were classified as the absence of radiographic progression after 2 years (i.e., preventing radiographic progression) as measured by total Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS), erosion score, and joint space narrowing (JSN) score. Effect modification by baseline joint damage, disease duration, and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) was studied. RESULTS: Overall, TCZ + MTX combination therapy was more effective in preventing radiographic progression compared to TCZ monotherapy, which was measured by total SHS score. However, in patients with early RA who had more joint damage compared to those with less joint damage at baseline (relative risk [RR] 1.02 versus RR 0.91, respectively) or in patients with a lower DAS28 score compared to those with a higher DAS28 score (RR 1.04 versus RR 0.92, respectively) at baseline, this advantage disappeared. In patients with established RA, the advantage of TCZ + MTX versus TCZ alone in the prevention of radiographic progression disappeared with a longer disease duration at baseline (RR 1.04 versus 0.83). Results of erosion scores as an outcome were in line with these findings, though findings for JSN scores were less clear. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with TCZ + MTX is more effective in preventing radiographic progression compared to TCZ monotherapy, but the effectiveness of TCZ monotherapy may approximate the effectiveness of TCZ + MTX in patients with early RA who have more joint damage and/or a lower DAS28 at baseline and in patients with established RA who have longer disease duration.

Keywords

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use, Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy, Disease Progression, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Methotrexate/therapeutic use, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Rheumatology, Journal Article

Citation

Verhoeven, M M A, Tekstra, J, Jacobs, J W G, Bijlsma, J W J, van Laar, J M, Pethö-Schramm, A, Borm, M E A, Lafeber, F P J & Welsing, P M J 2022, 'Efficacy of Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Tocilizumab and Methotrexate Combination Therapy in the Prevention of Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis : An Analysis Using Individual Patient Data From Multiple Clinical Trials', Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 889-895. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24524