Conceptual difficulties when interpreting histograms: A review

Publication date

2019-09

Authors

Boels, LonnekeISNI 0000000388666546
Bakker, ArthurORCID 0000-0002-9604-3448ISNI 0000000392965936
Van Dooren, Wim
Drijvers, PaulISNI 0000000369715867

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Histograms are widely used and appear easy to understand. Research nevertheless indicates that students, teachers and researchers often misinterpret these graphical representations. Hence, the research question addressed in this paper is: What are the conceptual difficulties that become manifest in the common misinterpretations people have when constructing or interpreting histograms? To identify these conceptual difficulties, we conducted a narrative systematic literature review and identified 86 publications reporting or containing misinterpretations. The misinterpretations were clustered and—through abduction—connected to difficulties with statistical concepts. The analysis revealed that most of these conceptual difficulties relate to two big ideas in statistics: data (e.g., number of variables and measurement level) and distribution (shape, centre and variability or spread). These big ideas are depicted differently in histograms compared to, for example, case-value plots. Our overview can help teachers and researchers to address common misinterpretations more generally instead of remediating them each individually.

Keywords

statistics education, histogram, big ideas of statistics, misconception, statistical concepts, statistical knowledge for teaching (SKT), Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

Citation

Boels, L, Bakker, A, Van Dooren, W & Drijvers, P 2019, 'Conceptual difficulties when interpreting histograms: A review', Educational Research Review, vol. 28, pp. 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100291