Conceptual difficulties when interpreting histograms: A review
Publication date
2019-09
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Histograms are widely used and appear easy to understand. Research nevertheless indicates that students, teachers and researchers often misinterpret these graphical representations. Hence, the research question addressed in this paper is: What are the conceptual difficulties that become manifest in the common misinterpretations people have when constructing or interpreting histograms? To identify these conceptual difficulties, we conducted a narrative systematic literature review and identified 86 publications reporting or containing misinterpretations. The misinterpretations were clustered and—through abduction—connected to difficulties with statistical concepts. The analysis revealed that most of these conceptual difficulties relate to two big ideas in statistics: data (e.g., number of variables and measurement level) and distribution (shape, centre and variability or spread). These big ideas are depicted differently in histograms compared to, for example, case-value plots. Our overview can help teachers and researchers to address common misinterpretations more generally instead of remediating them each individually.
Keywords
statistics education, histogram, big ideas of statistics, misconception, statistical concepts, statistical knowledge for teaching (SKT), Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability
Citation
Boels, L, Bakker, A, Van Dooren, W & Drijvers, P 2019, 'Conceptual difficulties when interpreting histograms: A review', Educational Research Review, vol. 28, pp. 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100291