Towards intrinsic R2* imaging in the prostate at 3 and 7tesla

Publication date

2017-10

Authors

Luttje, Mariska P
van Buuren, Laurens D
Luijten, Peter R.ORCID 0000-0002-8040-8449ISNI 0000000397136870
van Vulpen, MarcoISNI 0000000397109354
van der Heide, Uulke A
Klomp, Dennis W.J.ORCID 0000-0002-5884-5386ISNI 0000000396514008

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Purpose Hypoxia is an important marker for resistance to therapy. In this study, we quantify the macroscopic effects of R2* mapping in prostate cancer patients incorporating susceptibility matching and field strengths effects. Materials and methods 91 patients were scanned without endorectal coil (ERC) at 3 T. Only when rectal gas was absent, data was included for analysis. Another group of 10 patients was scanned using a susceptibility matched ERC. To assess the residual contamination of R2 and macroscopic field non-uniformities, a group of 10 patients underwent ultra-high resolution 7 T MRI. Results Of the patients scanned at 3 T 60% presented rectal gas and were excluded, due to susceptibility artifacts. At 3 T the tumor was significantly different (P < 0.01) from the healthy surrounding tissue in R2* values at intrapatient level. Using the measured median R2* value of 24.9 s − 1 at 3 T and 43.2 s − 1 at 7 T of the peripheral zone, the minimum contribution of macroscopic susceptibility effects is 15% at 3 T. Conclusion R2* imaging might be a promising tool for hypoxia imaging, particularly when minimizing macroscopic susceptibility effects contaminating intrinsic R2* of tissue, such as rectal gas. At 3 T macroscopic effects still contribute 15% in the R2* value, compared to ultra-high resolution R2* mapping at 7 T.

Keywords

Bold, High field, Hypoxia, Prostate (cancer), R2*, Taverne, Journal Article

Citation

Luttje, M P, van Buuren, L D, Luijten, P R, van Vulpen, M, van der Heide, U A & Klomp, DWJ 2017, 'Towards intrinsic R2* imaging in the prostate at 3 and 7tesla', Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 42, pp. 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2017.04.014