Cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to primary care for influenza-like-illness: economic evaluation alongside the randomised controlled ALIC4E trial in 15 European countries.

Publication date

2023-08

Authors

Li, Xiao
Bilcke, Joke
van der Velden, AlikeISNI 0000000395418997
Bruyndonckx, Robin
Coenen, Samuel
Bongard, Emily
de Paor, Muirrean
Chlabicz, Slawomir
Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
Francis, Nick

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oseltamivir is usually not often prescribed (or reimbursed) for non-high-risk patients consulting for influenza-like-illness (ILI) in primary care in Europe. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to usual primary care in adults/adolescents (13 years +) and children with ILI during seasonal influenza epidemics, using data collected in an open-label, multi-season, randomised controlled trial of oseltamivir in 15 European countries. METHODS: Direct and indirect cost estimates were based on patient reported resource use and official country-specific unit costs. Health-Related Quality of Life was assessed by EQ-5D questionnaires. Costs and quality adjusted life-years (QALY) were bootstrapped (N = 10,000) to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), from both the healthcare payers' and the societal perspectives, with uncertainty expressed through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and expected value for perfect information (EVPI) analysis. Additionally, scenario (self-reported spending), comorbidities subgroup and country-specific analyses were performed. RESULTS: The healthcare payers' expected ICERs of oseltamivir were €22,459 per QALY gained in adults/adolescents and €13,001 in children. From the societal perspective, oseltamivir was cost-saving in adults/adolescents, but the ICER is €8,344 in children. Large uncertainties were observed in subgroups with comorbidities, especially for children. The expected ICERs and extent of decision uncertainty varied between countries (EVPI ranged €1-€35 per patient). CONCLUSION: Adding oseltamivir to primary usual care in Europe is likely to be cost-effective for treating adults/adolescents and children with ILI from the healthcare payers' perspective (if willingness-to-pay per QALY gained > €22,459) and cost-saving in adults/adolescents from a societal perspective.

Keywords

Cost-utility analysis, Direct cost, Europe, ILI, Indirect cost, Multi-country, Productivity losses, QALY, Tamiflu, Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous), Health Policy, Journal Article

Citation

Li, X, Bilcke, J, van der Velden, A W, Bruyndonckx, R, Coenen, S, Bongard, E, de Paor, M, Chlabicz, S, Godycki-Cwirko, M, Francis, N, Aabenhus, R, Bucher, H C, Colliers, A, De Sutter, A, Garcia-Sangenis, A, Glinz, D, Harbin, N J, Kosiek, K, Lindbæk, M, Lionis, C, Llor, C, Mikó-Pauer, R, Radzeviciene Jurgute, R, Seifert, B, Sundvall, P-D, Touboul Lundgren, P, Tsakountakis, N, Verheij, T J, Goossens, H, Butler, C C, Beutels, P & ALIC4Etrial investigators 2023, 'Cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to primary care for influenza-like-illness: economic evaluation alongside the randomised controlled ALIC4E trial in 15 European countries.', The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 909-922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01521-2