Release Kinetics of Dexamethasone Phosphate from Porous Chitosan: Comparison of Aerogels and Cryogels

Publication date

2023-10-09

Authors

Chartier, Coraline
Buwalda, SijtzeISNI 0000000389931460
Ilochonwu, Blessing C.ISNI 0000000492829384
Van Den Berghe, Hélène
Bethry, Audrey
Vermonden, TinaISNI 0000000357250265
Viola, MartinaISNI 000000051164540X
Nottelet, Benjamin
Budtova, Tatiana

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Porous chitosan materials as potential wound dressings were prepared via dissolution of chitosan, nonsolvent-induced phase separation in NaOH-water, formation of a hydrogel, and either freeze-drying or supercritical CO2 drying, leading to “cryogels” and “aerogels”, respectively. The hydrophilic drug dexamethasone sodium phosphate was loaded by impregnation of chitosan hydrogel, and the release from cryogel or aerogel was monitored at two pH values relevant for wound healing. The goal was to compare the drug-loading efficiency and release behavior from aerogels and cryogels as a function of the drying method, the materials’ physicochemical properties (density, morphology), and the pH of the release medium. Cryogels exhibited a higher loading efficiency and a faster release in comparison with aerogels. A higher sample density and lower pH value of the release medium resulted in a more sustained release in the case of aerogels. In contrast, for cryogels, the density and pH of the release medium did not noticeably influence release kinetics. The Korsmeyer-Peppas model showed the best fit to describe the release from the porous chitosan materials into the different media.

Keywords

Taverne, Bioengineering, Biomaterials, Polymers and Plastics, Materials Chemistry

Citation

Chartier, C, Buwalda, S, Ilochonwu, B C, Van Den Berghe, H, Bethry, A, Vermonden, T, Viola, M, Nottelet, B & Budtova, T 2023, 'Release Kinetics of Dexamethasone Phosphate from Porous Chitosan : Comparison of Aerogels and Cryogels', Biomacromolecules, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 4494-4501. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01408