Oncological outcomes of planned and unplanned low Hartmann's procedure and restorative low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study

Publication date

2025-11-23

Authors

van Geffen, E G M
Verheij, F S
Hazen, S M J A
Sluckin, T C
Consten, E C J
Dekker, J-W T
Nederend, J
Peeters, K C M J
de Wilt, J H W
van Dieren, S

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, approximately 15% of patients with rectal cancer undergo a low Hartmann's procedure (low-HP). This is often preoperatively planned to avoid poor functional outcome or complications, but might be unplanned as a result of intraoperative difficulties. Low-HPs seem to be associated with worse oncological outcomes. METHODS: All patients who underwent either restorative low anterior resection (rLAR), planned low-HP, or unplanned low-HP for primary rectal cancer in 2016 were included from a nationwide cohort. Main outcomes were 4-year local recurrence (LR) rate and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Of 2043 patients, 1704 underwent rLAR (83.4%), 253 planned low-HP (12.4%), and 86 unplanned low-HP (4.2%). Among intended rLAR patients (n = 1790), independent risk factors for unplanned low-HP were older age, higher body mass index (BMI), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and more distal tumor location. Oncological outcomes after low-HPs were worse than after rLARs (LR 13.7% vs 5.6%, DFS 54.7% vs 71.8%, both p < 0.001), but similar for unplanned and planned low-HP. In multivariable analysis, unplanned and planned low-HP were not associated with LR or DFS, but R1 resection was (HR 6.6 (4.1-10.6), HR 3.0 (2.2-4.0), respectively). In R1 resections, the distal margin was more often involved after low-HP (70.0% vs 28.6%, p = 0.013) compared to rLAR. CONCLUSION: Poor outcomes in univariable analysis after low-HP appear to be associated with more challenging procedures and increased risk of involved resection margin rather than the low-HP itself. In case of expected difficulties, an extralevator abdominoperineal excision or referral to an expert center might be an alternative to improve resection margins. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05539417, retrospectively registered on September 16, 2022.

Keywords

Conversion to open surgery, Minimally invasive surgical procedures, Rectal cancer, Resection margins, Surgery, Gastroenterology, Journal Article, Observational Study

Citation

van Geffen, E G M, Verheij, F S, Hazen, S M J A, Sluckin, T C, Consten, E C J, Dekker, J-W T, Nederend, J, Peeters, K C M J, de Wilt, J H W, van Dieren, S, Hompes, R, Tuynman, J B, Marijnen, C A M, Tanis, P J, Kusters, M & DUTCH SNAPSHOT RESEARCH GROUP 2025, 'Oncological outcomes of planned and unplanned low Hartmann's procedure and restorative low anterior resection for rectal cancer : a population-based cross-sectional study', Techniques in coloproctology, vol. 30, no. 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03169-5