Discussion points for Bayesian inference
Publication date
2020-06
Authors
Aczel, Balazs
Hoekstra, Rink
Gelman, Andrew
Wagenmakers, Eric Jan
Klugkist, Irene G.
Rouder, Jeffrey N.
Vandekerckhove, Joachim
Lee, Michael D.
Morey, Richard D.
Vanpaemel, Wolf
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Comment
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.
Keywords
Taverne, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience
Citation
Aczel, B, Hoekstra, R, Gelman, A, Wagenmakers, E J, Klugkist, I G, Rouder, J N, Vandekerckhove, J, Lee, M D, Morey, R D, Vanpaemel, W, Dienes, Z & van Ravenzwaaij, D 2020, 'Discussion points for Bayesian inference', Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 561-563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z