Patients' and GPs' views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial

Publication date

2023-12

Authors

Smit, KarinORCID 0000-0002-0839-4185
Venekamp, Roderick P.ORCID 0000-0002-1446-9614ISNI 0000000393819260
Geersing, Geert-JanORCID 0000-0001-6976-9844
Rutten, Frans HORCID 0000-0002-5052-7332ISNI 0000000389122794
Schoonhoven, LisetteORCID 0000-0002-7129-3766
Zwart, Dorien L MORCID 0000-0003-0098-4882

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research on how home monitoring with a pulse oximeter is executed and experienced by patients with an acute illness such as COVID-19 and their GPs is scarce. AIM: To examine the process of structured home monitoring with a pulse oximeter for patients with COVID-19, their caregivers, and their GPs. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a mixed-method process evaluation alongside a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial. Patients drawn from a general practice setting, with COVID-19, and aged ≥40 years with cardiovascular comorbidities were included. METHOD: Quantitative trial data from 21 intervention group participants (age 63.2 years) were used, plus qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 15 patients (age 62.9 years), eight informal caregivers, and 10 GPs. RESULTS: Adherence to the intervention was very high; 97.6% of protocolised peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurements in the first 14 days until admission to hospital were recorded (677/694, median daily per patient 2.7). Three identified themes from the interviews were: (a) user-friendliness of home monitoring: easy use of the pulse oximeter and patient preference of a three times daily measurement scheme; (b) patient empowerment: pulse oximeter use enhanced patient self-assurance and empowered patients and informal caregivers in disease management; and (c) added value to current clinical decision making. GPs perceived the pulse oximeter as a useful diagnostic tool and did not experience any additional workload. They felt more secure with remote monitoring with a pulse oximeter than only phone-based monitoring, but emphasised the need to keep an overall view on the patient's condition. CONCLUSION: Structured home monitoring by pulse oximetry supports patients and their informal caregivers in managing, and GPs in monitoring, acute COVID-19 disease. It appears suitable for use in acutely ill patients in general practice.

Keywords

COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, general practice, oximetry, pulse oximetry, Family Practice

Citation

Smit, K, Venekamp, R P, Geersing, G-J, Rutten, F H, Schoonhoven, L & Zwart, D L 2023, 'Patients' and GPs' views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter : a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial', The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, vol. 73, no. 737, pp. e894-e902. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0139