The impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in European countries

Publication date

2017-09

Authors

Kleijnen, S.ISNI 0000000387164149
Meneses Leonardo Alves, T.I.ISNI 0000000524208858
Meijboom, Kim
Lipska, IgaISNI 0000000524045630
De Boer, AnthoniusISNI 0000000389596105
Leufkens, Bert G.M.ISNI 0000000392454327
Goettsch, WimORCID 0000-0002-8022-7496ISNI 0000000395155859

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the role of health-related quality-of-life (QoL) data in relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) of new anti-cancer drugs across European jurisdictions, during health technology assessment procedures. METHODS: Comparative analysis of guidelines and publicly available REAs in six European jurisdictions of anti-cancer drugs approved by EMA between 2011 and 2013. RESULTS: Fourteen anti-cancer drugs were included, adding up to 79 REAs. Whilst all guidelines state that QoL is a relevant endpoint to determine the relative effectiveness of new cancer drugs, QoL data were included in only 54% of the 79 reports and their impact on the recommendations was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst national guidelines recognize the relevance of QoL to determine the relative effectiveness of new anti-cancer drugs, this is not well-reflected in current assessments. Developing and implementing into REAs specific evidence requirements for QoL data would improve the use of this patient-centred outcome in future reimbursement and pricing decisions.

Keywords

Comparative effectiveness, Quality of life, Health technology assessment, Reimbursement, Antineoplastic agents, Patient-centred outcome research, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being

Citation

Kleijnen, S, Meneses Leonardo Alves, T, Meijboom, K, Lipska, I, De Boer, A, Leufkens, H G & Goettsch, W G 2017, 'The impact of quality-of-life data in relative effectiveness assessments of new anti-cancer drugs in European countries', Quality of Life Research, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2479-2488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1574-9