Application of the Improved City Blueprint Framework in 45 Municipalities and Regions

Publication date

2015-08-19

Authors

Koop, StefORCID 0000-0001-9906-3746ISNI 000000049252293X
van Leeuwen, KeesORCID 0000-0003-1605-4268ISNI 0000000373907618

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Rapid urbanization, water pollution, climate change and inadequate maintenance of water and wastewater infrastructures in cities may lead to flooding, water scarcity, adverse health effects, and rehabilitation costs that may overwhelm the resilience of cities. Furthermore, Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) is hindered by water governance gaps. We have analyzed IWRM in 45 municipalities and regions divided over 27 countries using the improved City Blueprint® Framework (CBF). The CBF incorporates solely performance-oriented indicators that more accurately measure the city’s own efforts and performances to improve its IWRM. We have also analyzed the trends and pressures (on which the city’s IWRM has a negligible influence). The Trends and Pressure Framework (TPF) creates awareness of the most stressing topics that either hamper or, on the contrary, pose opportunity windows for IWRM. The improved Blue City Index (BCI*) and the Trends and Pressures Index (TPI; the arithmetic mean of all TPF indicators) have been compared with other city descriptors. The BCI* and TPI showed a significant and negative Pearson correlation (r = −0.83). This implies that cities with pressing needs to improve their IWRM also face the highest environmental, financial and/or social limitations. The BCI* and TPI correlate significantly with the ND-GAIN climate readiness index (r = 0.86; r = −0.94), the environmental awareness index (r = 0.85; r = −0.85), the European green city index (r = 0.86; r = −0.85) and various World Bank governance indicators. Based on a hierarchical clustering of the 45 municipalities and regions, 5 different levels of sustainability of urban IWRM could be distinguished, i.e., (1) cities lacking basic water services, (2) wasteful cities, (3) water efficient cities, (4) resource efficient and adaptive cities, and (5) water wise cities. This categorization, as well as the CBF and TPF are heuristic approaches to speed up the transition towards water wise cities.

Keywords

Blue City Index®, Climate adaptation, Sustainability indicators, Waste treatment, Water management, Water Science and Technology, Civil and Structural Engineering, SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation, SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities, SDG 13 - Climate Action

Citation

Koop, S H A & van Leeuwen, C J 2015, 'Application of the Improved City Blueprint Framework in 45 Municipalities and Regions', Water Resources Management, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 4629-4647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1079-7