Local identity avoidance and reflexivity
Publication date
2026-03
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
In a great many languages something special is required for the expression of reflexivity. Cross-linguistically what is necessary varies from marking the object (e.g. pronoun + intensifier, a body-part noun, etc.), or using a special verb form (e.g. affix, special clitic, etc.). We discuss the limits of certain extant approaches to binding in accounting for this pattern. Going over the various cases we show that a key factor underlying this pattern is "local identity avoidance"If a DP were to bind a coargument straight away a logical form would result with two occurrences of the same variable in a local domain. Unless these can be kept apart, this would lead to a violation of a general principle of computation, not specific to language. We point towards possibly similar effects in other domains. We then discuss what underlies the variation in the ways languages express reflexivity. Universal is the need to find a strategy to avoid the consequences of our Inability to distinguish indistinguishables (IDI), but the specific choice will depend on the resources that are available in a particular language.
Keywords
3rd factor, detransitivization, IDI, logical-form, protection, reflexivity, Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language
Citation
Reuland, E & Everaert, M 2026, 'Local identity avoidance and reflexivity', Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 37-77. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2025-0026