How (Not) to Measure Loneliness: A Review of the Eight Most Commonly Used Scales
Publication date
2022-09-01
Authors
Maes, Marlies
Qualter, Pamela
Lodder, Gerine M.A.
Mund, Marcus
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
No license information available
Abstract
Loneliness affects well-being and has long-term negative impacts on physical and mental health, educational outcomes, and employability. Because of those current and long-term impacts, loneliness is a significant issue for which we need reliable and appropriate measurement scales. In the current paper, psychometric properties of the eight most commonly used loneliness scales are reviewed both descriptively and meta-analytically. Results suggest that for many of the scales, the psychometric properties are promising. However, for some psychometric features, especially test-retest reliability and measurement invariance, evidence is rather scarce. Most striking, however, is the fact that all of the scales included items that do not measure loneliness. Surprisingly, for many (sub)scales, this was even the case for about half of the items. Because our measures are the foundation of our research work, it is crucial to improve the way loneliness is being measured.
Keywords
loneliness, measurement, psychometrics, factor structure, reliability, measurement invariance, loneliness types, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Citation
Maes, M, Qualter, P, Lodder, G M A & Mund, M 2022, 'How (Not) to Measure Loneliness: A Review of the Eight Most Commonly Used Scales', International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 17, 10816, pp. 1-37. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710816