Clinical implementation of MRI-based organs-at-risk auto-segmentation with convolutional networks for prostate radiotherapy.

Publication date

2020-05-11

Authors

Savenije, Mark H.F.
Maspero, MatteoORCID 0000-0003-0347-3375
Sikkes, Gonda G
van der Voort van Zyp, Jochem R NISNI 0000000393775683
Kotte, A. N. T. J.ISNI 0000000395467270
Bol, G HORCID 0000-0002-7393-167XISNI 0000000392489626
van den Berg, CATORCID 0000-0002-5565-6889

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Structure delineation is a necessary, yet time-consuming manual procedure in radiotherapy. Recently, convolutional neural networks have been proposed to speed-up and automatise this procedure, obtaining promising results. With the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy, MR-based segmentation is becoming increasingly relevant. However, the majority of the studies investigated automatic contouring based on computed tomography (CT). PURPOSE: In this study, we investigate the feasibility of clinical use of deep learning-based automatic OARs delineation on MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 150 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who underwent MR-only radiotherapy. A three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted dual spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence was acquired with 3T MRI for the generation of the synthetic-CT. The first 48 patients were included in a feasibility study training two 3D convolutional networks called DeepMedic and dense V-net (dV-net) to segment bladder, rectum and femurs. A research version of an atlas-based software was considered for comparison. Dice similarity coefficient, 95% Hausdorff distances (HD95), and mean distances were calculated against clinical delineations. For eight patients, an expert RTT scored the quality of the contouring for all the three methods. A choice among the three approaches was made, and the chosen approach was retrained on 97 patients and implemented for automatic use in the clinical workflow. For the successive 53 patients, Dice, HD95 and mean distances were calculated against the clinically used delineations. RESULTS: DeepMedic, dV-net and the atlas-based software generated contours in 60 s, 4 s and 10-15 min, respectively. Performances were higher for both the networks compared to the atlas-based software. The qualitative analysis demonstrated that delineation from DeepMedic required fewer adaptations, followed by dV-net and the atlas-based software. DeepMedic was clinically implemented. After retraining DeepMedic and testing on the successive patients, the performances slightly improved. CONCLUSION: High conformality for OARs delineation was achieved with two in-house trained networks, obtaining a significant speed-up of the delineation procedure. Comparison of different approaches has been performed leading to the succesful adoption of one of the neural networks, DeepMedic, in the clinical workflow. DeepMedic maintained in a clinical setting the accuracy obtained in the feasibility study.

Keywords

radiotherapy, medical imaging, prostate cancer, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MR-only treatment planning, delineation, contouring, segmentation, artificial intelligence, Deep learning, Contouring, Segmentation, Delineation, Radiotherapy, Magnetic resonance imaging, Prostate cancer, Artificial intelligence, Journal Article

Citation

Savenije, M, Maspero, M, Sikkes, G G, van der Voort van Zyp, J, Kotte, ANTJ, Bol, GH & van den Berg, CAT 2020, 'Clinical implementation of MRI-based organs-at-risk auto-segmentation with convolutional networks for prostate radiotherapy.', Radiation Oncology, vol. 15, no. 1, 104, pp. 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01528-0