Early mechanical reperfusion in high-risk pulmonary embolism supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a multicenter international cohort study
Files
Publication date
2026-03-01
Authors
Levy, David
Petit, Matthieu
Assouline, Benjamin
Dietl, Alexander
Lebreton, Guillaume
Giraud, Raphaël
Ihle, Joshua
Masi, Paul
Newman, Sally
Condella, Anna
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore how early mechanical reperfusion impacts outcomes in high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). METHODS: This retrospective international study included adult patients treated with VA-ECMO for high-risk PE at 39 ECMO centers (2014-2024). Early mechanical reperfusion was defined as catheter-directed therapy or surgical embolectomy within 48 hours of ECMO initiation. Patients dying within 12 hours or receiving delayed reperfusion were excluded. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality, assessed using propensity-matched groups. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 492 patients on VA-ECMO (median age, 53 years), 69% had cardiac arrest, and 28% received early mechanical reperfusion. After propensity matching, 137 patients were compared in each group. Ninety-day mortality was 32% with early mechanical reperfusion on ECMO versus 39% with ECMO stand-alone (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.45-1.03]; P = .07). Overall, ECMO duration and weaning rates were similar; however, early mechanical reperfusion improved ECMO weaning in patients without prior thrombolysis (subdistribution HR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.03-2.36]; P = .04). Bleeding occurred in 50% of patients, with no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this large international cohort of patients with high-risk PE on VA-ECMO, early mechanical reperfusion therapy was not associated with a reduction in 90-day mortality or ECMO duration. These findings may support a stepwise, individualized approach favoring initial ECMO stand-alone support, although a certain clinical benefit from early mechanical reperfusion in selected patients cannot be excluded.
Keywords
Taverne, Journal Article
Citation
Levy, D, Petit, M, Assouline, B, Dietl, A, Lebreton, G, Giraud, R, Ihle, J, Masi, P, Newman, S, Condella, A, Riera, J, Pierrot, M, Mansour, A, Ohshimo, S, Thellier, L, Donker, D W, Besnard, C, Vennier, A, Winiszewski, H, Tavazzi, G, Taylor, J, Dessajan, J, Lepper, P M, Yeung Ng, P, Chico, J I, Guervilly, C, Pot, L, Dauwe, D, Fortuna, P, Taccone, F S, Compagnon, B, Jung, J-S, Ltaief, Z, Roncon-Albuquerque, R, Denormandie, P, Giani, M, Duburcq, T, Grasselli, G, Nougué, H, Werquin, A, Sanchez, O, Beurton, A, Balik, M, Jungling, M, Heinrich, M, Mueller, T, Combes, A, Schmidt, M & CATAPULTE Investigator Group 2026, 'Early mechanical reperfusion in high-risk pulmonary embolism supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation : a multicenter international cohort study', American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, vol. 212, no. 3, pp. 474-486. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamaf116