Q fever in the Netherlands: Occupational exposure, pregnancy outcomes, and chronic Q fever screening
Publication date
2020-05-25
Authors
Lange, Maria Margaretha Alida de
Editors
Advisors
Coutinho, R.A.
Hoek, W. van der
Schneeberger, P.M.
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Dissertation
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Many sheep farm residents and veterinary students experienced a Q fever infection in the past, while only a few have had complaints of the acute illness. However, these people may still be at risk of a chronic infection. Although it is not known how high that risk is, I recommend to screen occupationally exposed people annually for a chronic infection when they have an additional risk factor. Risk factors for a chronic infection are having a cardiovascular disease or being immunocompromised. In this way, a chronic infection in occupationally exposed people can be detected in time.
Pregnant women who lived in an Q fever-affected area in 2008-2010, had not a higher risk for premature birth or perinatal mortality. However, there was a marginal higher risk for having a baby small for gestational age. Because of these results, it is not justified to screen all pregnant women and possibly treat them with antibiotics in an area with a Q fever outbreak.
Seven years after the large Dutch Q fever outbreak, still new chronic Q fever infections were diagnosed in patients with a heart valve defect. Also because of this reason, it is cost-effective to screen people with a risk factor once for chronic Q fever if they lived in Q fever affected areas.
Keywords
Coxiella burnetii; Q fever; epidemiology; public health; occupational exposure; seroepidemiological studies; obstetrics; heart valve disease; chronic Q fever; economic evaluation