Reanimation and Copyright. Rob Scholte’s Work. Part II.
Publication date
2017-12-28
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
A viable way to defend the rights of later picture makes to use and change the works of their predecessors is by reference to the artistic merit of the later works. Rob Scholte intentionally infringes on copyright law by making new works, and it is the artistic merit of his work that should give him that liberty.
Keywords
copyright, Rob Scholte, philosophy of art
Citation
van Gerwen, R C H M 2017, 'Reanimation and Copyright. Rob Scholte’s Work. Part II.', Aesthetic Investigations, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 76-87. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4118785