Effector-mediated discovery of a novel resistance gene against Bremia lactucae in a nonhost lettuce species

Publication date

2017-11

Authors

Giesbers, Anne K J
Pelgrom, A.J.E.ISNI 000000050603660X
Visser, Richard G F
Niks, Rients E
van den Ackerveken, G.ORCID 0000-0002-0183-8978ISNI 0000000446388098
Jeuken, Marieke J W

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Candidate effectors from lettuce downy mildew (Bremia lactucae) enable high-throughput germplasm screening for the presence of resistance (R) genes. The nonhost species Lactuca saligna comprises a source of B. lactucae R genes that has hardly been exploited in lettuce breeding. Its cross-compatibility with the host species L. sativa enables the study of inheritance of nonhost resistance (NHR). We performed transient expression of candidate RXLR effector genes from B. lactucae in a diverse Lactuca germplasm set. Responses to two candidate effectors (BLR31 and BLN08) were genetically mapped and tested for co-segregation with disease resistance. BLN08 induced a hypersensitive response (HR) in 55% of the L. saligna accessions, but responsiveness did not co-segregate with resistance to Bl:24. BLR31 triggered an HR in 5% of the L. saligna accessions, and revealed a novel R gene providing complete B. lactucae race Bl:24 resistance. Resistant hybrid plants that were BLR31 nonresponsive indicated other unlinked R genes and/or nonhost QTLs. We have identified a candidate avirulence effector of B. lactucae (BLR31) and its cognate R gene in L. saligna. Concurrently, our results suggest that R genes are not required for NHR of L. saligna.

Keywords

avirulence, effector-triggeredimmunity (ETI), Lactuca saligna, lettucedowny mildew, nonhost resistance, oomycete, quantitative trait locus (QTL), R gene

Citation

Giesbers, A K J, Pelgrom, A J E, Visser, R G F, Niks, R E, Van den Ackerveken, G & Jeuken, M J W 2017, 'Effector-mediated discovery of a novel resistance gene against Bremia lactucae in a nonhost lettuce species', New Phytologist, vol. 216, no. 3, pp. 915-926. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14741