Interpretability Logic
Publication date
1988-09
Authors
Visser, A.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Preprint
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Interpretations are much used in metamathematics. The first application that comes to
mind is their use in reductive Hilbert-style programs. Think of the kind of program
proposed by Simpson, Feferman or Nelson (see Simpson[1988], Feferman[1988],
Nelson[1986]). Here they serve to compare the strength of theories, or better to prove
conservation results within a properly weak theory. An advantage of using
interpretations is that even if their use should -perhaps- be classified as a prooftheoretical
method, it is often possible to employ a model-theoretical heuristics. An
example is given in section 7.2 where a conservation result due to Paris & Wilkie,
which is proven by a model-theoretical argument, is formalized in a weak theory. For
more discussion of and perspective on the use of interpretability in reductive
programs the reader is referred to Feferman[1988].