Individualized conditioning regimes in cord blood transplantation: Towards improved and predictable safety and efficacy
Files
Publication date
2016-06
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The conditioning regimen used in cord blood transplantation (CBT) may significantly impact the outcomes. Variable pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs used may further influence outcome. Individualized dosing takes inter-patient differences in PK into account, tailoring drug dose for each individual patient in order to reach optimal exposure. Dose individualization may result in a better predictable regimen in terms of safety and efficacy, including timely T cell reconstitution, which may result in improved survival chances. AREAS COVERED: Conditioning regimens used in CBT varies significantly between and within centres. For busulfan, individualized dosing with therapeutic drug monitoring has resulted in better outcomes. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), used to prevent rejection and GvHD, significantly hampers early T-cell reconstitution (IR). Timely IR is crucial in preventing viral reactivations and relapse. By individudalizing ATG, IR is better predicted and may prevent morbidity and mortality. EXPERT OPINION: Individualization of agents used in the conditioning regimen in CBT has proven its added value. Further fine-tuning, including new drugs and/or comprehensive models for all drugs, may result in better predictable conditioning regimens. A predictable conditioning regimen is also of interest/importance when studying adjuvant therapies, including immunotherapies (e.g. cellular vaccines or engineered T-cell) in a harmonized clinical trial design setting.
Keywords
cord blood, individualized dosing, hematopoietic cell transplantation, PK/PD, Journal Article
Citation
Admiraal, R & Boelens, J J 2016, 'Individualized conditioning regimes in cord blood transplantation : Towards improved and predictable safety and efficacy', Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2016.1164688