Diagnostic value of emergency medical services provider judgement in the identification of head injuries among trauma patients
Publication date
2019-02-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Background and purpose: Previous studies have reported that many patients with a severe head injury are not transported to a higher-level trauma centre where the necessary round-the-clock neurosurgical care is available. The aim of this study was to analyse the diagnostic value of emergency medical services (EMS) provider judgement in the identification of a head injury. Methods: In this multicentre cohort study, all trauma patients aged 16 years and over who were transported with highest priority to a trauma centre were evaluated. The diagnostic value of EMS provider judgement was determined using an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥1 in the head region as reference standard. Results: A total of 980 (35.4%) of the 2766 patients who were included had a head injury. EMS provider judgement (Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥1) had a sensitivity of 67.9% and a specificity of 87.7%. In the cohort, 208 (7.5%) patients had a severe head injury. Of these, 68% were transported to a level I trauma centre. Conclusions: Identification of a head injury on-scene is challenging. EMS providers could not identify 32% of the patients with a head injury and 21% of the patients with a severe head injury. Additional education, training and a supplementary protocol with predictors of a severe head injury could help EMS providers in the identification of these patients.
Keywords
head injury, neurotrauma, pre-hospital, trauma, triage, Taverne, Neurology, Clinical Neurology
Citation
van Rein, E A J, Jochems, D, Lokerman, R D, van der Sluijs, R, Houwert, R M, Lichtveld, R A, van Es, M A, Leenen, L P H & van Heijl, M 2019, 'Diagnostic value of emergency medical services provider judgement in the identification of head injuries among trauma patients', European Journal of Neurology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 274-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13804