Are slaughterhouse-obtained livers suitable for use in ex vivo perfusion research?
Publication date
2023-08-11
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by_nc
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The success of the ex vivo machine perfusion of pig livers used for preclinical research depends on organ quality and availability. In this study, we investigated whether livers obtained from slaughterhouses are suitable and equivalent to livers obtained from laboratory pigs. METHODS: Livers were obtained from slaughterhouse pigs stunned by electrocution or CO 2 inhalation and from laboratory pigs. For the latter group, 45 minutes of warm ischemia was mimicked for a subgroup, ensuring a valid comparison with slaughterhouse-derived livers. RESULTS: Livers from CO 2-stunned pigs showed lower indocyanine green clearance and bile production, higher blood lactate and potassium concentrations, and higher alanine aminotransferase activities than electrically stunned pigs. Furthermore, livers from electrically stunned pigs, and livers from laboratory pigs, subjected or not to warm ischemia, showed similar performance in terms of perfusion and metabolism. CONCLUSION: For an ex vivo liver model generated using slaughterhouse pigs, electrical stunning is preferable to CO 2 stunning. Livers from electrically stunned slaughterhouse pigs performed similarly to laboratory pig livers. These findings support the use of livers from electrically stunned slaughterhouse pigs, which may therefore provide an alternative to livers obtained from laboratory pigs, consistent with the principle of the 3Rs.
Keywords
Normothermic machine perfusion, duration of warm ischemia, electrical stunning, liver perfusion, slaughterhouse animal, the 3Rs, Biochemistry, medical, Biochemistry, Cell Biology
Citation
Ruppelt, A, Pijnenburg, I, Pappers, C, Samsom, R-A, Kock, L, Grinwis, G C M, Spee, B, Rasponi, M & Stijnen, M 2023, 'Are slaughterhouse-obtained livers suitable for use in ex vivo perfusion research?', Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 51, no. 8, 3000605231189651. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231189651