Intranasal vitamin B12 administration in elderly patients: A randomized controlled comparison of two dosage regimens.
Publication date
2024-08
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by_nc
Abstract
AIM: Vitamin B 12 deficiency is common in the elderly population. Standard treatment via intramuscular injections, however, has several disadvantages. Safer and more convenient dosage forms such as intranasal are therefore being explored. This study compares the effects of two intranasal vitamin B 12 dosage regimens in elderly vitamin B 12-deficient patients. METHODS: Sixty patients ≥65 years were randomly assigned to either a loading dose (daily administration for 14 days followed by weekly administration) or a no loading dose (administration every 3 days) regimen for 90 days. Each dose contained 1000 μg cobalamin. Total vitamin B 12, holotranscoblamin (holoTC), methylmalonic acid (MMA) and total homocysteine (tHcy) levels in serum were measured on days 0, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90. RESULTS: Both dosage regimens resulted in a rapid increase of vitamin B 12 and holoTC concentrations and normalization of initial high, MMA and tHcy concentrations. The loading dose regimen resulted in the fastest and greatest increase to a median vitamin B 12 of 1090 pmol/L (reference 350-650 pmol/L) concentration after 14 days. Following weekly administration, B 12 rapidly decreased to a median concentration of 530 pmol/L after 90 days. The no loading dose regimen resulted in a steady increase to a median vitamin B 12 of 717 pmol/L after 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal vitamin B 12 administration is an effective and suitable way to replenish and sustain vitamin B 12 levels in elderly patients.
Keywords
cobalamin, deficiency, dosage regimen, elderly, intranasal, vitamin B, Pharmacology (medical), Pharmacology
Citation
Tillemans, M P H, Giezen, T J, Egberts, T C G, Hooijberg, J H & Kalisvaart, K J 2024, 'Intranasal vitamin B12 administration in elderly patients : A randomized controlled comparison of two dosage regimens.', British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 1975-1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16084