Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice
Publication date
2005
Authors
Anderson, J.H.
Honneth, A.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Part of book or chapter of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
One of liberalism’s core commitments is to safeguarding individuals’ autonomy.
And a central aspect of liberal social justice is the commitment
to protecting the vulnerable. Taken together, and combined with an understanding
of autonomy as an acquired set of capacities to lead one’s
own life, these commitments suggest that liberal societies should be especially
concerned to address vulnerabilities of individuals regarding the
development and maintenance of their autonomy. In this chapter, we
develop an account of what it would mean for a society to take seriously
the obligation to reduce individuals’ autonomy-related vulnerabilities to
an acceptable minimum. In particular, we argue that standard liberal accounts
underestimate the scope of this obligation because they fail to
appreciate various threats to autonomy.
The reason these vulnerabilities have been underestimated, we believe,
is because autonomy has generally been understood in an essentially individualistic
fashion. The alternative account of autonomy we sketch here
highlights the ways in which individuals’ autonomy can be diminished or
impaired through damage to the social relations that support autonomy.
By articulating a conception of autonomy in terms of, more specifically,
a theory of mutual recognition, we aim to pinpoint the individualistic
bias in liberal accounts and the concomitant underestimation of our dependence
on relationships of respect, care, and esteem. We conclude
by anticipating some broader implications of this for how proceduralist
accounts of social justice ought to be revised.