Risk of a first ever acute myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality with sulphonylurea treatment: a population-based cohort study

Publication date

2018-04

Authors

van Dalem, Judith
Brouwers, Martijn Cgj
Stehouwer, Coen DA
Krings, André
Klungel, Olaf H.ISNI 0000000390199414
Driessen, Johanna H M
de Vries, FrankORCID 0000-0003-3837-8319ISNI 0000000393640594
Burden, Andrea M.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

We investigated the association between the current use of individual sulphonylureas and the risk of a first ever acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and all-cause mortality, in a population-based cohort study using primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) database (2004-2012). New users (N=121,869) with at least one prescription for a non-insulin antidiabetic agent, and aged ≥18 years were included. The first prescription defined start of follow-up. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of a first ever AMI and all-cause mortality associated with the use of individual sulphonylureas, and other non-insulin glucose-lowering drugs. No differences in risk of a first ever AMI (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]: 1.02, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.70-1.50) or all-cause mortality (HRadj: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.80-1.17) were observed comparing gliclazide use with non-gliclazide sulphonylurea use. Similar results were found for each individual sulphonylurea. As evidence is accumulating that gliclazide is no safer than other sulphonylureas, current guidelines suggesting superiority should be carefully evaluated.

Keywords

acute myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, sulphonylureas, type 2 diabetes mellitus, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being

Citation

van Dalem, J, Brouwers, M C, Stehouwer, C DA, Krings, A, Klungel, O H, Driessen, J H, de Vries, F & Burden, A M 2018, 'Risk of a first ever acute myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality with sulphonylurea treatment : a population-based cohort study', Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1056-1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13168