Robot-assisted spleen preserving pancreatic surgery in MEN1 patients
Files
Publication date
2016-09-15
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Background: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients often undergo multiple pancreatic operations at a young age. Objective: To describe robot-assisted and laparoscopic spleen-preserving pancreatic surgery in MEN1 patients, and to compare both techniques. Methods: Robot-assisted pancreatectomies of the DutchMEN1 study group and the Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France were compared to a historical cohort of laparoscopic treated MEN1 patients. Perioperative outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 21 MEN1 patients underwent minimally invasive pancreatic surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, seven patients were subjected to robot-assisted surgery, and 14 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. Demographics and clinical characteristics did not differ between the cohorts and no significant differences in operative outcomes were found. A high number of ISGPS grade B/C pancreatic fistulas were observed in both cohorts (38%), and no conversions were seen in the robot-assisted cohort (respectively 0% vs. 43%, P = 0.06). In one laparoscopic and one robot-assisted case the primary tumor was not resected. Conclusions: Minimally invasive spleen-preserving surgery in MEN1 patients is safe and feasible. Patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery did not require conversion to open surgery.
Keywords
laparoscopic pancreatic surgery, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, neuroendocrine tumors, pancreas, robot-assisted pancreatic surgery, Taverne, Surgery, Oncology, Journal Article
Citation
Nell, S, Brunaud, L, Ayav, A, Bonsing, B A, Groot Koerkamp, B, Nieveen van Dijkum, E J, Kazemier, G, de Kleine, R H J, Hagendoorn, J, Molenaar, I Q, Valk, G D, Borel Rinkes, I H M & Vriens, M R 2016, 'Robot-assisted spleen preserving pancreatic surgery in MEN1 patients', Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 456-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24315