Assessing regime destabilisation through policy change: An analysis of agricultural policy in the United Kingdom during Brexit

Publication date

2024-03

Authors

Frank, Leonard
Feola, G.ORCID 0000-0003-1069-503XISNI 0000000352267447
Schäpke, Niko

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

In sustainability transitions research, the deliberate destabilisation of socio-technical regimes is increasingly recognised as a central intervention point. Absent, however, are granular approaches for assessing whether regime destabilisation actually occurs in processes of systemic change. We propose to assess regime destabilisation through shifts in the institutionalisation of field logics. Methodologically, we employ Socio-Technical Configuration Analysis to map changes over time in the composition and alignment of institutional and technological concepts embedded in sectoral policy. Empirically, we assess the extent to which post-Brexit agricultural policy reform in the United Kingdom marks the destabilisation of an unsustainable regime. Assessing legislative debate transcripts, we find that the previously dominant regime is only partly destabilised, as pre-existing development trajectories along established configurations of field logics, policy goals and instruments remain. These findings support the validity of our conceptual approach. Moreover, they nuance expectations about large-scale policy change as windows of opportunity for regime shifts.

Keywords

Discourse, Institutional logics, Policy reform, Regime destabilisation, Socio-Technical Configuration Analysis, Sustainability transitions, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Environmental Science (miscellaneous), Social Sciences (miscellaneous), SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy

Citation

Frank, L, Feola, G & Schäpke, N 2024, 'Assessing regime destabilisation through policy change : An analysis of agricultural policy in the United Kingdom during Brexit', Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 50, 100810, pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100810