Coping with coopetition—Facing dilemmas in cooperation for sustainable development: The case of the Dutch smart grid industry

Publication date

2019

Authors

Planko, JuliaISNI 0000000524651171
Chappin, Maryse M HORCID 0000-0001-6247-1930ISNI 0000000111188748
Cramer, Jacqueline
Hekkert, Marko P.ORCID 0000-0003-0570-5117ISNI 0000000139241969

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

This paper is amongst the first to examine coopetition strategy for sustainable development at the network level. Companies who want to successfully implement complex innovative technologies that support sustainable development need to collaborate with other actors of the innovation ecosystem, including their competitors, so that they can develop standards, interoperable products, pool knowledge, and resources and bundle forces to compete against other technologies. Collaboration with competitors brings benefits, but also many risks. We investigated how firms cope with these risks when establishing an innovation ecosystem to implement a new technology in society. We conducted research in the Dutch smart grids sector and explored how these firms minimize inherent risks of coopetition. We found that system-building actors in the Dutch smart grid field not only minimize inherent risks, but from the start of their collaboration they implement so-called enablers to prevent these risks upfront.

Keywords

collaboration, collective system building, coopetition, innovation ecosystem, sustainability technologies, sustainable development, Taverne, Business and International Management, Geography, Planning and Development, Strategy and Management, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy

Citation

Planko, J, Chappin, M M H, Cramer, J & Hekkert, M P 2019, 'Coping with coopetition—Facing dilemmas in cooperation for sustainable development : The case of the Dutch smart grid industry', Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 665-674. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2271