Endovascular Therapy for Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion

Publication date

2021-05-20

Authors

Langezaal, L. C M
van der Hoeven, Erik J R J
Mont'Alverne, Francisco J A
de Carvalho, João J F
Lima, Fabrício O
Dippel, Diederik W J
van der Lugt, Aad
Lo, Rob T H
Boiten, Jelis
Lycklama À Nijeholt, Geert J

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of endovascular therapy in patients with stroke caused by basilar-artery occlusion has not been well studied. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients within 6 hours after the estimated time of onset of a stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive endovascular therapy or standard medical care. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome, defined as a score of 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability, 3 indicating moderate disability, and 6 indicating death) at 90 days. The primary safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 3 days after the initiation of treatment and mortality at 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were enrolled (154 in the endovascular therapy group and 146 in the medical care group). Intravenous thrombolysis was used in 78.6% of the patients in the endovascular group and in 79.5% of those in the medical group. Endovascular treatment was initiated at a median of 4.4 hours after stroke onset. A favorable functional outcome occurred in 68 of 154 patients (44.2%) in the endovascular group and 55 of 146 patients (37.7%) in the medical care group (risk ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.50). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 4.5% of the patients after endovascular therapy and in 0.7% of those after medical therapy (risk ratio, 6.9; 95% CI, 0.9 to 53.0); mortality at 90 days was 38.3% and 43.2%, respectively (risk ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.12). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stroke from basilar-artery occlusion, endovascular therapy and medical therapy did not differ significantly with respect to a favorable functional outcome, but, as reflected by the wide confidence interval for the primary outcome, the results of this trial may not exclude a substantial benefit of endovascular therapy. Larger trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy for basilar-artery occlusion. (Funded by the Dutch Heart Foundation and others; BASICS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01717755; Netherlands Trial Register number, NL2500.).

Keywords

Taverne, General Medicine

Citation

Langezaal, L C M, van der Hoeven, E J R J, Mont'Alverne, F J A, de Carvalho, J J F, Lima, F O, Dippel, D W J, van der Lugt, A, Lo, R T H, Boiten, J, Lycklama À Nijeholt, G J, Staals, J, van Zwam, W H, Nederkoorn, P J, Majoie, C B L M, Gerber, J C, Mazighi, M, Piotin, M, Zini, A, Vallone, S, Hofmeijer, J, Martins, S O, Nolte, C H, Szabo, K, Dias, F A, Abud, D G, Wermer, M J H, Remmers, M J M, Schneider, H, Rueckert, C M, de Laat, K F, Yoo, A J, van Doormaal, P-J, van Es, A C G M, Emmer, B J, Michel, P, Puetz, V, Audebert, H J, Pontes-Neto, O M, Vos, J-A, Kappelle, L J, Algra, A, Schonewille, W J & BASICS Study Group 2021, 'Endovascular Therapy for Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion', The New England journal of medicine, vol. 384, no. 20, pp. 1910-1920. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2030297