The Intricacies of Computational Electrochemistry
Publication date
2025-09-12
Authors
Govindarajan, Nitish
Kastlunger, Georg
Gauthier, Joseph A.
Cheng, Jun
Filot, Ivo
Hagopian, Arthur
Hansen, Heine Anton
Huang, Jun
Kowalski, Piotr M.
Liu, Jinwen
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Computational electrochemistry is hard-anybody who has ever tried will know. We argue that the reasons for its complexity lie not only in the multiscale nature of electrochemical processes but also in the rapid, ongoing method development in the field. This has resulted in a lack of clear guidelines and many open discussions in the community. These issues were also the topic of a recent Lorentz Center workshop, the key take-away messages of which are highlighted in this Perspective. In particular, we discuss why the choice between constant potential and constant charge simulations is less trivial than it may seem, why interpreting electrochemical reaction free energy diagrams can be challenging, why the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equation is not all there is, and why we desperately need more benchmarking in the field.
Keywords
Activation, Co2, Dependence, Dissolution, Evolution, Insights, Oxygen reduction, Proton discharge, Simulation, Understand
Citation
Govindarajan, N, Kastlunger, G, Gauthier, J A, Cheng, J, Filot, I, Hagopian, A, Hansen, H A, Huang, J, Kowalski, P M, Liu, J, Lombardi, J M, Maraschin, M, Peterson, A, Pillai, H S, Prats, H, Price, C J, van Roij, R, Rossmeisl, J, Seemakurthi, R R, Shin, S-J, Smith, A, Zhu, J-X & Doblhoff-Dier, K 2025, 'The Intricacies of Computational Electrochemistry', ACS Energy Letters, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 4277–4288. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.5c00748