Evaluating cost-effectiveness of RSV vaccination strategies for older adults in the Netherlands

Publication date

2025-10-24

Authors

Zeevat, Florian
Luttjeboer, Jos
Korsten, Koos
van Boven, MichielORCID 0000-0002-0841-2400
Postma, Maarten J.
van der Pol, Simon
Boersma, Cornelis

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination for older adults in the Netherlands, aiming to identify the most effective vaccination strategy. Methods: A static decision tree cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare no vaccination with various RSV vaccination strategies for Dutch adults over six RSV seasons. Strategies included vaccinating adults aged ≥60, ≥75, and ≥75 combined with high-risk individuals aged 60–74. Each was assessed with two- and three-year intervals. The model incorporated health outcomes and costs associated with RSV disease and vaccination from a societal perspective, with a lifetime horizon. Recent incidence data were used, and vaccine effectiveness was based on efficacy from a meta-analysis for outpatient settings and real-world effectiveness data for inpatient settings. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted, using a €50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) willingness-to-pay threshold. Results: Vaccinating individuals aged ≥75 years and high-risk groups every three years could prevent approximately 19,000 general practitioner visits, 3300 hospitalizations (including 245 intensive care admissions), and 870 deaths in the first year. This strategy would avoid €29.5 million in healthcare costs and €6.3 million in productivity losses, gaining 2900 QALYs. It was cost-effective, with an average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) of €30,804/QALY. The most cost-effective strategy was vaccinating ≥75 year-olds every three years, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 23,080/QALY compared to no vaccination. Vaccinating all ≥60-year-olds every three years resulted in the highest QALY gain, with an ACER of €39,918/QALY. Compared to the ≥75 and high-risk strategy, this approach had an ICER of €107,623/QALY, whereas the 75+ and high-risk strategy had an ICER of €61,987/QALY compared to the ≥75 strategy alone. Biennial strategies were associated with higher ACERs and were dominated in incremental comparisons. Conclusion: RSV vaccination for older adults in the Netherlands can be cost-effective, particularly when vaccinating every three years.

Keywords

Cost-effectiveness, Older adults, RSV, Vaccination strategy, Taverne, Molecular Medicine, General Immunology and Microbiology, General Veterinary, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, Journal Article

Citation

Zeevat, F, Luttjeboer, J, Korsten, K, van Boven, M, Postma, M J, van der Pol, S & Boersma, C 2025, 'Evaluating cost-effectiveness of RSV vaccination strategies for older adults in the Netherlands', Vaccine, vol. 65, 127735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127735