Mapping simulated visual field defects with movie-viewing pupil perimetry

Publication date

2025-06

Authors

Cai, YuqingISNI 0000000517912302
Strauch, ChristophORCID 0000-0002-6380-8635ISNI 0000000493067211
van der Stigchel, S.ISNI 0000000396732697
ten Brink, A.F.ORCID 0000-0001-7634-0819ISNI 0000000492496380
Cornelissen, Frans W.
Naber, MarnixORCID 0000-0003-4208-8437ISNI 0000000419502457

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Purpose: Assessing the quality of the visual field is important for the diagnosis of ophthalmic and neurological diseases and, consequently, for rehabilitation. Visual field defects (VFDs) are typically assessed using standard automated perimetry (SAP). However, SAP requires participants to understand instructions, maintain fixation and sustained attention, and provide overt responses. These aspects make SAP less suitable for very young or cognitively impaired populations. Here we investigate the feasibility of a new and less demanding form of perimetry. This method assesses visual sensitivity based on pupil responses while performing the perhaps simplest task imaginable: watching movies. Method: We analyzed an existing dataset, with healthy participants (n = 70) freely watching movies with or without gaze-contingent simulated VFDs, either hemianopia (left- or right-sided) or glaucoma (large nasal arc, small nasal arc, and tunnel vision). Meanwhile, their gaze and pupil size were recorded. Using a recently published toolbox (Open-DPSM), we modeled the relative contribution of visual events to the pupil responses to indicate relative visual sensitivity across the visual field and to dissociate between conditions with and without simulated VFDs. Result: Conditions with and without simulated VFDs could be dissociated, with an AUC ranging from 0.85 to 0.97, depending on the specific simulated VFD condition. In addition, the dissociation was better when including more movies in the modeling but the model with as few movies as 10 movies was sufficient for a good classification (AUC ranging from 0.84 to 0.96). Conclusion: Movie-viewing pupil perimetry is promising in providing complementary information for the diagnosis of VFDs, especially for those who are unable to perform conventional perimetry.

Keywords

Glaucoma, Hemianopia, Modeling pupil size, Pupil perimetry, Simulated visual field defects, Ophthalmology, Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Citation

Cai, Y, Strauch, C, Van der Stigchel, S, ten Brink, A F, Cornelissen, F W & Naber, M 2025, 'Mapping simulated visual field defects with movie-viewing pupil perimetry', Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 263, no. 6, pp. 1641-1650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06733-1