Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks: a guide through modern methods

Publication date

2022-05-24

Authors

Van Geloven, Nan
Giardiello, Daniele
Bonneville, Edouard F.
Teece, Lucy
Ramspek, Chava L.
van Smeden, MaartenORCID 0000-0002-5529-1541
Snell, Kym I.E.
Van Calster, Ben
Pohar-Perme, Maja
Riley, Richard D.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Thorough validation is pivotal for any prediction model before it can be advocated for use in medical practice. For time-to-event outcomes such as breast cancer recurrence, death from other causes is a competing risk. Model performance measures must account for such competing events. In this article, we present a comprehensive yet accessible overview of performance measures for this competing event setting, including the calculation and interpretation of statistical measures for calibration, discrimination, overall prediction error, and clinical usefulness by decision curve analysis. All methods are illustrated for patients with breast cancer, with publicly available data and R code.

Keywords

Humans, Models, Statistical, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Taverne, General Medicine, Journal Article

Citation

Van Geloven, N, Giardiello, D, Bonneville, E F, Teece, L, Ramspek, C L, Van Smeden, M, Snell, K I E, Van Calster, B, Pohar-Perme, M, Riley, R D, Putter, H & Steyerberg, E 2022, 'Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks : a guide through modern methods', The BMJ, vol. 377, e069249. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-069249